Two templates in this library take opposite positions on the same question, and it is worth reading them together. The ten-cut popcorn commercial schedules every cut to a hundredth of a second. This one schedules nothing at all — eleven shots separated by commas in a single paragraph.
The reason the loose approach is right here is arithmetic. Eleven shots across ten seconds is under a second each, and at that density there is no meaningful difference between 0.8 and 0.9 seconds — but there is a large difference between a shot that completes its motion and one that gets cut off. Hand the model a precise schedule at this density and it will meet it by truncating, because meeting the numbers is the more literal instruction. Let it distribute the time and it will give the sweeping camera move the second and a half it needs and take that back from a macro shot of ice, which is the trade you would have made.
What replaces the schedule is a set of global constraints, and there are exactly three. A focal length: 35mm, stated once at the top. A grade: blue, purple and pink, stated twice — once woven into the opening description and once in the technical list at the end. And a depth of field: shallow, also stated twice. Nothing else is consistent across the eleven shots, and nothing else needs to be.
That is the actual lesson. Montage coherence is not narrative, it is optics. Eleven unrelated images shot on the same lens, graded to the same three colours and focused at the same shallow stop will read as one film even though nothing connects them. Change the lens between shots and the same eleven images read as a stock reel, because the human eye is far more sensitive to a change in lens character than to a change in subject.
The bookend is the one structural device. The first shot and the last shot are the same woman — first at full length beside the pool, finally in extreme close-up on her eyes. Nine shots of party footage in between. That framing costs two shots out of eleven and it converts a collection into a piece, because the viewer leaves with the sense of having been somewhere and come back.
The material list in the macro block is a small piece of craft worth stealing. Glossy skin, sparkling fabric, rippling liquid, reflective chrome. Four surfaces, each with a completely different specular response, named in one clause. It gives the model licence to make four visually distinct macro shots without introducing a single new colour, which is precisely the problem a macro montage inside a locked palette has to solve.
The last sentence, "reference images are attached for style", is the only part of the prompt that is not self-contained, and it is a reminder about what a style reference is for. It is not a scene the video has to reproduce. It is a swatch: palette, lens character, finish. Supplying a style reference that contains a specific composition tends to produce eleven variations on that composition, which is not what a montage is.